Tuesday, 31 January 2017

British and American film age ratings


The BBFC implement age ratings to determine what films they find suitable for what ages. Yet it is a commonly known fact that under-18's feel the desire to ignore these age ratings. 

Filmmakers have always been allowed to get advice from the BBFC about the age rating their film will probably get. Sometimes they send in the film before it is finished, and Senior Examiners watch it without special effects, music or other details. The Senior Examiners can give a good idea of the rating the film will probably get based on our guidelines. If the filmmakers decide the likely rating is too high, they may decide to change the film, eg by removing scenes or changing the special effects, so they are more likely to get the lower rating they want. This is called a ‘cut for category’ and is the most common sort of cut made to films in the UK.

Since the early 1960s research evidence has been accumulating that suggests that exposure to violence in television, movies, video games, cell phones, and on the internet increases the risk of violent behavior on the viewer’s part just as growing up in an environment filled with real violence increases the risk of them behaving violently. In the current review this research evidence is critically assessed, and the psychological theory that explains why exposure to violence has detrimental effects for both the short run and long run is elaborated. Finally, the size of the “media violence effect” is compared with some other well known threats to society to estimate how important a threat it should be considered.

Most researchers define media violence as visual portrayals of acts of physical aggression by one human or human-like character against another. This definition has evolved as theories about the effects of media violence have evolved and represents an attempt to describe the kind of violent media presentation that is most likely to teach the viewer to be more violent. Movies depicting violence of this type were frequent 75 years ago and are even more frequent today, e.g., M, The Maltese Falcon, Shane, Dirty Harry, Pulp Fiction, Natural Born Killers, Kill Bill. Violent TV programs became common shortly after TV became common in American homes about 55 years ago and are common today, e.g., Gunsmoke, Miami Vice, CSI, and 24. More recently, video games, internet displays, and cell phone displays have become part of most children’s growing-up, and violent displays have become common on them, e.g., Grand Theft Auto, Resident Evil, Warrior.

Hypodermic needle theory

The "hypodermic needle theory" implied mass media had a direct, immediate and powerful effect on its audiences. The mass media in the 1940s and 1950s were perceived as a powerful influence on behaviour change. Several factors contributed to this "strong effects" theory of communication, including: the fast rise and popularisation of radio and television. The emergence of the persuasion industries, such as advertising and propaganda; the Payne Fund studies of the 1930s, which focused on the impact of motion pictures on children. Hitler's monopolization of the mass media during WWII to unify the German public behind the Nazi party.

Thursday, 26 January 2017

Production Cycle

Pre-Production • The Director would take on overall ‘creative’ responsibility of the production, the style of shooting and editing, and working with the actors to deliver the story in the script including conveying the emotion and dynamic of the characters. The DOP in conjunction with the Director would be responsible for the look of the film, the style of the filming, again achieving what would have been suggested by the writer in the script.

Producers • Producers are frequently the first person to become involved in a project; they participate directly in all the main producing phases; and see the project through production, to post- production, marketing and distribution. • The Producer's is role to turn story ideas into profitable cinematic entertainment, and to persuade others to share in his or her commercial and creative vision. Producers usually report to the production company, or to the Executive Producers appointed to supervise the production on behalf of the financiers and Distributors.

Distribution • Releasing and Sustaining a film in the market place • Worked best when the three key stages (Production, Distribution, Exhibition) are linked or controlled by the same company • UK system has more focus on marketing and sustaining a film in the local market • Independent Studios struggle to get distribution - No formal connection between Producers, distributors and exhibitors • Collaboration – need to get a major company on side.

Marketing • Every major Hollywood studio/distribution has an internal department for promotion and the resources to promote (TV, Magazines, Radio) • The marketing campaign will be cohesive across all media platforms • Most common forms are teaser trailers, trailers, Adverts in News papers and Magazines, Television spots, Radio promo, internet (official websites, viral sites, social networking) and billboards.

Exhibition • Exhibition is the retail branch of the film industry. • What the exhibitor sells is the experience of a film (and, frequently, concessions like soft drinks and popcorn). • Because exhibitors to some extent control how films are programmed, promoted, and presented to the public, they have considerable influence over the box-office success and, more importantly, the reception of films.

Monday, 23 January 2017

Paul

Release date
14 February 2011 (2011-02-14) (United Kingdom)
18 March 2011 (2011-03-18) (United States)

Running time
104 minutes
110 minutes (unrated version)


Country

United Kingdom
United States
LanguageEnglish
Budget: £32.64 million
Box office: £78.62 million




Two sci-fi geeks take a pilgrimage to America's UFO heartland. While there, they accidentally meet an alien who brings them on an insane road trip that alters their universe forever. For the past 60 years, an alien named Paul (voiced by Seth Rogan) has been hanging out at a top-secret military base. When he discovers he's been taken prisoner, the space-traveling smart ass decides to escape the compound and hop on the first vehicle out of town - a rented RV containing Earthlings Graeme Willyand Clive Golling. Chased by federal agents and the fanatical father of a young woman that they accidentally kidnap, Graeme and Clive hatch a fumbling escape plan to return Paul to his mother ship. And as two nerds struggle to help, one little green man might just take his fellow outcasts from misfits to intergalactic heroes.

Details

Official Sites:

  |  |  »

Country:

  | 

Language:

  | 

Release Date:

 18 March 2011 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

 Change the Channel!  »

Box Office

Budget:

 $40,000,000  (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

 £5,517,121 (UK) (18 February 2011)

Gross:

 $37,371,385  (USA) (13 May 2011)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed  on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

  |  (Unrated)

Sound Mix:

  |   | 

Color:

  |   (archive footage) 

Aspect Ratio:

 2.35 : 1
See  »






Music by 

David Arnold

Cinematography by 

Lawrence Sher...director of photography 

Film Editing by 

Chris Dickens

Casting By 



Allison Jones

Rango

Release date

February 14, 2011 (2011-02-14) (Westwood premiere)
March 4, 2011 (2011-03-04) (United States)

Running time
107 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget: $135 million

Box Office: $245.7 million


Rango is a pet chameleon always on the lookout for action and adventure, except the fake kind, where he directs it and acts in it. After a car accident, he winds up in an old western town called Dirt. What this town needs the most is water, but they also need a hero and a sheriff. The thirsty Rango instantly takes on the role of both and selfishly agrees to take on the case of their missing water.

Directed by 


Gore Verbinski

Writing Credits  


John Logan
(written by)









Details

Official Sites:

  |  |  »

Country:

 

Language:

 

Release Date:

 4 March 2011 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

 Untitled Gore Verbinski Animated Project  »

Box Office

Budget:

 $135,000,000  (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

 £1,638,613 (UK) (4 March 2011)

Gross:

 $123,207,194  (USA) (1 July 2011)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed  on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

 

Sound Mix:

  |   | 

Color:

 

Aspect Ratio:

 2.35 : 1
Johnny Depp was the main man

Company 3 (digital intermediate) 
DeLuxe - main tech thing

Produced by 

Mark Bakshi...consulting producer 
John B. Carls...producer 
Adam Cramer...co-producer 
Shari Hanson...co-producer 
Tim Headington...executive producer 
Graham King...producer 
Nils Peyron...consulting producer 
David Shannon...co-producer 
Gore Verbinski...producer 

Music by 

Hans Zimmer

Cinematography by 



Roger Deakins...(cinematography consultant) 

Friday, 20 January 2017

Essay comparing and contrasting the difference between British and American film from 1930's to 2000's

Essay comparing and contrasting the difference between British and American film from 1930's to 2000's.

The difference between British and American films now is absolutely enormous with America blowing Britain completely out of the water; but was this always the case? Has America always made more money from films than Britain has or is it only in more recent years that they've started to take the lead? The answer to that question will be concluded by the end of this essay. Technical advancements will definitely be a factor that I will be comparing but I will also take into account the film budgets as well. Every possible crook and cranny will be analysed to find out whether America has always been the film superpower or whether it had to win that title.

The first thing I will cover will be the years where Britain were almost on level-pegging with America, this era was the 1930's to 1940's. 1936 is often referred to as the 'golden age' of cinema but it was actually the 1940's that are generally thought of as Britain's greatest years. This is because it was during these years that a lot of the old great war films were made. Although it was also during these years that America released the film that gave them a jumpstart in the film industry. In 1941 Citizen Kane was released and even today that film is remembered as on of the greats.

The next few decades after this were poor for the British film industry in comparison to the American one. This is due to the fact that America released some more all-time greats that even went on to have more great sequels. Films like Jaws and Star Wars. Star Wars was in fact a massive risk for America at this point because until Lucas Film released their biggest title Science-Fiction films were not at all popular; in fact most of them up until this point were a total flop, that is until the tide was changed and now Science-Fiction is probably the most notable of all the film genres! The only prominent film that Britain managed to release during this time was Trainspotters - which coincidentally is releasing its long-awaited sequel this year.

Due to the fact that America had sky-rocketed ahead of Britain in the film industry, Britain had to use American companies to make films like Harry Potter and James Bond because otherwise Britain just would not have the funds needed to produce, advertise and distribute them. Even though the Harry Potter franchise alone made over one billion pounds for the British Film Industry there is still no way they can compete with America. Although they had a bit of a boost when James Cameron released Avatar because despite the fact that America just produced the highest-grossing film in history, they had to sacrifice the use of digitally exporting films - this meant that Britain could now get films at just as good quality as America could, as opposed to getting the used tapes that had a clear difference in quality.

So Britain could now have high-quality films in their cinema's. This would have been an absolute dream for the British Film Industry, more people going to see films at the cinema and therefore bringing money into it. The only problem with this was that America soon rectified the problem they had and subsequently opened a range of multiplex cinema's such as Vue, Cineworld and Odeon. This meant that America could now take advantage of the increase in cinema-goers and also determine what films were played when in their cinemas. This meant that there was a rise in American films and a decrease in British films, resulting in yet another loss for the British Film Industry.

Thursday, 19 January 2017

Film theories

As Hanseen (2007) summarised, 'The Hollywood studio system era' of vertical integration that impacted production, distribution and exhibition (because the major companies owned the cinemas) came to an end in 1948; "when the USA Supreme Court issued its famous Paramount decision. The Paramount consent decree required the divestiture of affiliated cinema chains and the abandonment of a number of vertical practices"

As McDougall (2008) summarised, five major distribution companies dominate the UK film industry:
- United International Pictures
- Warner Brothers
- Buena Vista
- 20th Century Fox
- Sony
None of these distribution companies are British, approximately 9/10 films seen in UK cinemas have been distributed by these Hollywood companies. In the majority of cases, these companies are either the same company who produced the film or are directly linked to the Hollywood production companies who made the film (vertical integration). Although the Paramount 1948 Supreme Court ruling now prevents these companies from owning the cinemas used for exhibition, films distributed by these Hollywood companies are still prioritized (for reasons of long term and short term profit) over films produced/distributed by independent companies e.g. Hollywood films generally gross more than a independent film and also because they make more films than independent companies cinemas can make more each year through supporting Hollywood films than they would if they started prioritizing independent films over Hollywood releases (doing this might prompt Hollywood to stop using this chain which would obviously impact profit for the cinema). 

Hollywood conglomerates


Search Results

Biggest Hollywood companies

  • 20th Century Fox 
  • Columbia Pictures 
  • MGM (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer)
  • Paramount Pictures
  • Universal Studios 
  • Warner Bros
  • Disney



Thursday, 12 January 2017

History of British film industry

* Mise-en-scene e.g. where is the action set? Who are the stars? What is the lighting like? What are 
   the costumes like? - In the Hollywood film 'Avatar' it is set in a futuristic setting and it is evident from the graphics, the camera work, the mise-en-scenes, that this film had an insurmountably high budget. Not just this but this film brought in a new age of cinema and graphics, heights that had never been reached before. This is part of the reason that this film has the highest grossing box-office profit of all time. 'Slumdog Millionaire' is does not give you the same sort of impression when it comes to the films budget



* What genre is the film?Avatar is fantasy/sci-fi/action. Slumdog Millionaire is Drama.


* What is the script like? The script of Avatar has a lot more profanity due to the fact it's an action and America are well-known for it's high-pace action with no language barrier. Slumdog Millionaire on the other hand is a more uplifting film and so it doesn't contain as much profanity but more inspirational language. There was a lot of jargon to do with Avatar in the Avatar script due to the fact that it is set in another world.,


* What is the camera work (image quality/range of shots etc.) like?

* What is the editing (special effects etc) like?
Avatar's special effects are nothing short of the best; Avatar brought in a new age of special effects that no one had ever seen before. Slumdog Millionaire does not quite have the same amount of opportunities for special effects as Avatar does and so it cannot be rated anywhere near the same level.


* What do you think the budget was for the film?

* Who do you think the primary target audience is? 




* Do you think the film made a profit?



* What films genres do you think Britain and America are stereotypically famous for based on these trailers and your own prior knowledge of films? 




1. The Third Man (Reed, 1949) - British - 

The Third Man is a 1949 British film noir
Box office£277,549


Citizen Kane - US

Citizen Kane is a 1941 American mystery drama
Budget$839,727
Box office$1.6 million

Directed byOrson Welles
Produced byOrson Welles
Screenplay by
  • Herman J. Mankiewicz
  • Orson Welles
Starring
  • Orson Welles
  • Joseph Cotten
  • Dorothy Comingore
  • Everett Sloane
  • Ray Collins
  • George Coulouris
  • Agnes Moorehead
  • Paul Stewart
  • Ruth Warrick
  • Erskine Sanford
  • William Alland

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

What is a British film?

What is a British film?

As critic McDougall (2008) states there are various 'official' ways of categorising British films. The most common is through using the following categories defined by the BFI (British Film Institute):

Category A: Films made with British money, personnel and resources.
Category B: Films co-funded with money from British and from foreign investment, but for which the majority of finance, cultural content and personnel are British.
Category C: Films with mostly foreign money (but non USA) investment and a small British input either financially or creatively.
Category D: Films made in the UK with (usually) British cultural content, but financed fully or partly by US companies.
Category E: US films with some British involvement.  




Paul and Rango